Internet Commingling and Case Law Precedent: GOOD for the Defense

Based on the settled case law of Pennsylvania vs Weakley and Selenski in Luzerne County, Joseph Kerekes now has a MUCH stronger legal precedent for separating his trial from that of Harlow Cuadra because Cuadra clearly incriminates Kerekes on TWO major segments of the Blacks Beach tapes in cleverly phrased questions asked by SEAN LOCKHART that in our opinion were literally placed in his mouth by agents.

Of course separate trials mean MUCH more difficulty in gaining convictions since with so much weight placed on the Blacks Beach tapes ostentatiously referred to by GRANT ROY at the preliminary hearing - but not played - such critical evidence could not be used against Harlow unless Joe testifies against Harlow at Harlow's trial (and vice versa).

Significantly, we have learned much emphasis is to be placed on the "tone" and "context", i.e. the WAY Harlow Cuadra said certain things on the Blacks Beach tapes, not so much WHAT he said.

In all fairness this could be VERY major to the jury since everyone has said things in a tone, or with a look, that mean something MUCH different than the actual words. With Cuadra so enamored of Lockhart at the time, LOOK FOR MAJOR EMPHASIS BY THE DEFENSE ON THIS ASPECT OF CONVERSATION, BODY LANGUAGE, AND TONE OF VOICE.

The fact that KRUEZER AT NIGHT has ALSO learned the defense is preparing to "grill SEAN LOCKHART within an inch of his life" makes the credibility and usefulness of LOCKHART on the witness stand for the prosecution that much more questionable.

And there's YET ANOTHER major IMPEDIMENT to effective prosecution "beyond a reasonable doubt": As the Bitchless Blog correctly points out (thank you Mr. Everhard),
"it is impossible for anyone to know what internet activity was done by Joe and what internet activity was done by Harlow. Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes appear to have used the same computers and posted stuff on the net using each other's names and other aliases..."

This is the "INTERNET COMMINGLING" sources close to the case have told us about. It makes it almost impossible to prove which of the defendants said, did or sent whatever at any specific date and time due to their totally commingled and shared Internet access including the WAN air card.

RESULT: Things are looking more rosy for the Defense...IF they pursue and obtain SEPARATE TRIALS and manage to make SEAN LOCKHART look like a scheming, opportunistic sociopath on the witness stand.

Of course the SEAN LOCKHART so many know and love isn't ANYTHING like that, he's simply a sweet young guy who got taken advantage of by the ALLEGEDLY evil monster BRYAN KOCIS and is now flying right thanks to GRANT ROY.

Right? That's ONE version according to CAMP CORRIGAN. But certainly not the only one - or necessarily the true one.

STAY TUNED as we see what Harlow and Joe say about this in their blogs...or at least those who are writing their blogs for them say.

That's the opinion of the BICOASTAL INVESTIGATIONS team in association with KRUEZER AT NIGHT. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved