Dangerous Case Law Precedent set in Kocis-Cuadra case by Arbitrary Ruling about Atty. Fannick

The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas has just arbitrarily and capriciously REDEFINED what constitutes an implied or actual attorney-client relationship in disqualifying attorney Demetrius Fannick from defending Bryan Kocis murder co-defendant Harlow Cuadra.

It's a sad day for Pennsylvania jurisprudence that we hope will be overturned on appeal.

Now conflict counsel Stephen Menn, Michael Senape and Paul Galante will resume their roles as Cuadra's attorneys - which opens a whole new can of worms.

This case and its background and antecedents is weirder than any movie or soap opera - but there are lives at stake and a life lost. Hopefully the appellate court will reverse this ruling, which in our view sets a very dangerous precedent by allowing a court and prosecutors to essentially play both ends against the middle - while arguably jeapordizing the defendant's right to competent and timely counsel.